Unnecessary bylaw

News columnist Mark Rushton has rightly said that the tree protection bylaw is unnecessary, and just harasses the public.

It should be abrogated.

Trees standing in front of the houses should be considered the property of the dwellers, and they should be free to trim, cut or uproot them.

We are all conscious of the importance of forestation, and people seldom do something to harm it.

I support  Mark in this respect.

Nagindar Singh Rangoowal

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

COLUMN: Arbitrary decisions aren’t necessarily right
Chef Michael Smith visits Abbotsford
Election 2014: Cindy Schafer to run again for school trustee position
Wait For Me Daddy memorial to be unveiled in New Westminster
EDITORIAL: A look back on 25 years
Fenced in by an abusive relationship
Shooting and stabbing in Maple Ridge
COLUMN: Reality check on teen suicide
COLUMN: Crime in the crosshairs

Community Events, September 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Sep 26 edition online now. Browse the archives.