Unnecessary bylaw
News columnist Mark Rushton has rightly said that the tree protection bylaw is unnecessary, and just harasses the public.
It should be abrogated.
Trees standing in front of the houses should be considered the property of the dwellers, and they should be free to trim, cut or uproot them.
We are all conscious of the importance of forestation, and people seldom do something to harm it.
I support Mark in this respect.
Nagindar Singh Rangoowal
COMMENTS
Let's keep comments:
We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters.
We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.